Notes on a great interview with David Broockman
Picayune comment: his last name is Broockman (2 O's) - you have it correctly a few times but mostly you're missing an o!
🙏
Thanks - corrected!
Concerning the 2016 comment, something like this you had in mind? https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2400076121 You were probably thinking of a 2017 paper involving a ton of field experiments, where they showed something similar.
I probably am! Do you have the reference?!
Of course, sorry: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/minimal-persuasive-effects-of-campaign-contact-in-general-elections-evidence-from-49-field-experiments/753665A313C4AB433DBF7110299B7433
Thanks. I can't see anything in that about staffers predicting the effect of different adverts, but it is a great paper
Picayune comment: his last name is Broockman (2 O's) - you have it correctly a few times but mostly you're missing an o!
🙏
Thanks - corrected!
Concerning the 2016 comment, something like this you had in mind? https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2400076121 You were probably thinking of a 2017 paper involving a ton of field experiments, where they showed something similar.
I probably am! Do you have the reference?!
Of course, sorry: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/minimal-persuasive-effects-of-campaign-contact-in-general-elections-evidence-from-49-field-experiments/753665A313C4AB433DBF7110299B7433
Thanks. I can't see anything in that about staffers predicting the effect of different adverts, but it is a great paper