Robert Talisse argues in Democracy and Moral Conflict that the epistemic justification for democratic conditions is also required to allow for moral pluralism because truth seeking is universal whereas the diversity values and moral commitments can preclude any way of resolving conflicts in a Rawlsian public reasons scenario. It seems like there may be some overlap with Democratic Reason.?
Robert Talisse argues in Democracy and Moral Conflict that the epistemic justification for democratic conditions is also required to allow for moral pluralism because truth seeking is universal whereas the diversity values and moral commitments can preclude any way of resolving conflicts in a Rawlsian public reasons scenario. It seems like there may be some overlap with Democratic Reason.?
sounds like it, although I've not read Talisse